patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

IRS Offers Tips for Year-End Giving

IRS Videos:   Exempt Organizations Select Check:  English | Spanish

                        Fair Market Value of Charitable Donations:  English | Spanish | ASL

Podcasts:       Exempt Organizations Select Check: English | Spanish

Individuals and businesses making contributions to charity should keep in mind some key tax provisions that have taken effect in recent years, especially those affecting donations of clothing and household items and monetary donations.

Rules for Clothing and Household Items

To be deductible, clothing and household items donated to charity generally must be in good used condition or better. A clothing or household item for which a taxpayer claims a deduction of over $500 does not have to meet this standard if the taxpayer includes a qualified appraisal of the item with the return. Household items include furniture, furnishings, electronics, appliances and linens.

Guidelines for Monetary Donations

To deduct any charitable donation of money, regardless of amount, a taxpayer must have a bank record or a written communication from the charity showing the name of the charity and the date and amount of the contribution. Bank records include canceled checks, bank or credit union statements, and credit card statements. Bank or credit union statements should show the name of the charity, the date, and the amount paid. Credit card statements should show the name of the charity, the date, and the transaction posting date.

Donations of money include those made in cash or by check, electronic funds transfer, credit card and payroll deduction. For payroll deductions, the taxpayer should retain a pay stub, a Form W-2 wage statement or other document furnished by the employer showing the total amount withheld for charity, along with the pledge card showing the name of the charity.

These requirements for the deduction of monetary donations do not change the long-standing requirement that a taxpayer obtain an acknowledgment from a charity for each deductible donation (either money or property) of $250 or more. However, one statement containing all of the required information may meet both requirements.

Reminders

To help taxpayers plan their holiday-season and year-end giving, the IRS offers the following additional reminders:

  • Contributions are deductible in the year made. Thus, donations charged to a credit card before the end of 2012 count for 2012. This is true even if the credit card bill isn’t paid until 2013. Also, checks count for 2012 as long as they are mailed in 2012.
  • Check that the organization is qualified. Only donations to qualified organizations are tax-deductible. Exempt Organization Select Check, a searchable online database available on IRS.gov, lists most organizations that are qualified to receive deductible contributions. In addition, churches, synagogues, temples, mosques and government agencies are eligible to receive deductible donations, even if they are not listed in the database.
  • For individuals, only taxpayers who itemize their deductions on Form 1040 Schedule A can claim deductions for charitable contributions. This deduction is not available to individuals who choose the standard deduction, including anyone who files a short form (Form 1040A or 1040EZ). A taxpayer will have a tax savings only if the total itemized deductions (mortgage interest, charitable contributions, state and local taxes, etc.) exceed the standard deduction. Use the 2012 Form 1040 Schedule A to determine whether itemizing is better than claiming the standard deduction.
  • For all donations of property, including clothing and household items, get from the charity, if possible, a receipt that includes the name of the charity, date of the contribution, and a reasonably-detailed description of the donated property. If a donation is left at a charity’s unattended drop site, keep a written record of the donation that includes this information, as well as the fair market value of the property at the time of the donation and the method used to determine that value. Additional rules apply for a contribution of $250 or more.
  • The deduction for a motor vehicle, boat or airplane donated to charity is usually limited to the gross proceeds from its sale. This rule applies if the claimed value is more than $500. Form 1098-C, or a similar statement, must be provided to the donor by the organization and attached to the donor’s tax return.
  • If the amount of a taxpayer’s deduction for all noncash contributions is over $500, a properly-completed Form 8283 must be submitted with the tax return.
  • And, as always it’s important to keep good records and receipts.

IRS.gov has Additional information on charitable giving including:

Ruth

10:29 am on Sunday, December 23, 2012

Thank you for the tips on saving for the Irs.
Taxes are coming up and we have to be careful that what we deduct is honest.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Fae Danner

10:08 am on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Ruth, I admire your emphasis on honesty regarding taxes, considering the dishonesty we see each day from our federal government. For heavens sake, our US Treasurer, Tim Geitner, is regarded to have neglected to pay his taxes. I am an honest person, myself; however, I sometimes wonder why. I have to work hard to remember that there are good people in government and even harder to believe that some are even smart enough to do the job for which they were elected. I am thankful, on a local level, to have Justin Simmons and Bob Freeman as our representatives.

Ruth

2:41 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Hi Fae, it does not matter if other people are honest or dishonest. You have to look at yourself and be thankful that you are honest. Remember some of the taxes go for schools, firemen, the police department and the parks that we have. This is how we get to enjoy the National and city parks and get protection from the police and firemen.

Reply

John Q. Public

2:54 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Thank you, both, for being honest and paying your fair share. 5 percent pay 40 percent of all taxes, so 'fair share' means different things to different folks. However, I am grateful for all who fully contribute, so I can pay as little as possible.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Pundit

2:08 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

Yet 1% of Americans control 90% of America's wealth and they don't even pay 40% of the taxes. It is time to tax the hell out of the rich so the middle class can get a break they well deserve. The Tea Party is a tool of the rich and is designed to fool the middle class.

Comment_arrow

John Q. Public

12:47 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Ah, yes, Envy. That great human failing so skilfully manipulated by BHO to string many disparate groups into a successful, winning coalition. All made possible by a complicit, swooning media, who ignored all bad reports and exaggerated the good. We depend on the IRS to punish the successful, but taking them down a notch or two, confiscating their hard-earned income in the interest of 'fairness.'

Joe R

4:51 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

What about the corporations and the super rich who not only do not pay their fair share of federal income taxes but some corporations go years without paying federal income taxes and still get refunds. What about the scam corporations run on states and cities, getting them in bidding wars so that the corporation gets all kind of tax abatements, tax holidays, subsidies, reduced property taxes, almost free land and other sweetheart deals. That's less revenue for the state and the jobs that are supposedly created don't make up for the lost revenue. >>"...5 percent pay 40 percent of all taxes.." More Rush Limbaugh garbage to cover for the rich who are paying the lowest tax rates in decades. Working people, including the working poor, pay wage taxes, state taxes, they may pay income taxes if their income reaches a certain level, they may be paying property taxes, gas taxes, sales taxes and excise taxes. I know the right wing wants us to bow down and kiss the feet of the rich because they are the supposed job creators (in COMMUNIST China, India, Mexico, and COMMUNIST Viet Nam). Return the top marginal tax rates to what they were during the Nixon era.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stan Walker

7:17 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

The rich already pay more than their fair share.

Joe R

7:17 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

From abcnews.go.com:
Rick Schottenfeld, Chairman and CEO of Schottenfeld Group Holdings, said he is in favor of raising the tax on capital gains to help plug the budget deficit.
A registered Republican, Rick Schottenfeld has been vocal about raising the capital gains tax despite the fact that doing so will lower his income.
The long-term capital gains tax rate on most investment assets is generally 15 percent now.
Schottenfeld is a member of the Patriotic Millionaires, a group of over 200 Americans with incomes over $1 million a year who are petitioning lawmakers to increase taxes for the wealthy to help plug the budget deficit, which has topped $1 trillion over the last four years.
"This whole process of lowering taxes to create jobs has led to bigger deficits, and made it so we can't afford to pay for things we need," he said.

Reply

John Q. Public

7:17 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Joe R, if you know of these get rich schemes, take advantage of them! Why are you letting ONLY the super-rich and corporations go years without paying taxes, and you not joining in? Almost free land, and other sweetheart deals, please send them my way! I will make it worth your while. Tax holidays, subsidies, reduced property taxes are good opportunities, so you have only yourself to blame if you don't act quickly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe R

7:56 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Uh, I'm not making $10 million a year but it doesn't make me a bad person. The corporations are making billions a year. You are comparing me to somebody like Bill Gates and to a corpration like General Electric.

Gary Junstrom

7:56 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Stan Walker - you are correct. The top 5 percent pay 40 percent of the taxes and the top 20 percent pay 90 percent. The bottom fifty percent pay nothing. And Obama wants to take even more from the top 20 to give to the bottom 50. I have an idea. If the rich are so reviled, they should close their businesses, throw everyone out of work and take their money to a place where Obama can't get to it. And if any rich person wants to pay more, feel free to write a check. Just don't encourage the socialists in DC to soak the rest of the working people.

Reply

Joe R

7:56 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Sorry, what we have now is crony predatory capitalism which is stacked against the poor, the working poor and the middle class. The very wealthy and the big corporations hire thousands of lobbyists to purchase politicians and laws that favor them only. That's not democracy, that's not a democratic republic, that's a plutocracy, rule by the rich and the economic royalists. What we have is a country of the corporations, by the CEOs and for hedge fund managers, the people be damned. Please, Obama is a center right politician who has surrounded himself with corporatists. I get the message from the other people posting here. We must accomodate rich people, give them whatever they want, do not offend the rich people, they are very sensitive, shh, Jamie Dimon must not be inconvenienced but it's OK to keep the minimum wage at poverty levels for all eternity, it's OK to gut, cut and slice up Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. It's OK to dump on the working poor, poor people in general but the rich must be worshipped.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eyeballs

8:20 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Hey, Joe, when't the next Communist Party Meeting. I heard you're speaking.

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

10:49 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

the solution is simple....a flat tax for all and a national sales tax of $0.05 cents on any sale over $10.00.

Maryann Campling

8:19 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

It seems to be popular to criticize the Corporations...let's see....the fuel oil that heats my home and the gas that allows me the luxury of driving my car....the food that has been delivered to the stores, the companies who process and distribute everything anyone would ever want to eat...the medical advances and pharmaceuticals that keep us alive...all brought to us by the evil Corporations. The list goes on and on...I don't worship the rich....only God....but I am smart enough to know that when they are making money, it trickles down to me...but what happens when Atlas Shrugs?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Marc L.

10:49 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

The fuel oil you bought and the gas for your car...are you paying more for that? Good, because Exxon is making record profits while we pay more at the pumps and for heating oil. That car you have? Did you pay more for it than you did your last car? Sure glad the government helped bail out the companies and keep them in business so they could charge you more. Your prescriptions and your benefits, if you're lucky enough to have coverage...did they go up last year? Yeah...mine too. Awfully nice of the insurance companies and Big Pharma to share their increased profits with the little people. The food you buy has gone up in cost, in part because of fuel surcharges...but the grocery stores you buy them from are working with people making minimum wage. The stuff you bought at WalMart on the cheap was a great deal for you, but comes at the expense of a company paying minimum wage to employees and withholding hours to keep people from being able to qualify for benefits.

The big corporations are making a ton of money. Nothing is trickling down to me at all. What I've earned for myself this past year I've worked to earn. Nothing came to me cheaper because the big businesses and the rich are making more money.

Scorn&SlightRegard

10:49 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Per the IRS website, the bottom 50% make under $29K per year. Just how much taxes do you want those people to pay ? Even a flat 10% of that Income would be an enormous burden.

But, yeah -- let's make a lot of noise about how unfair it is to even think about taxing Millionaires. The last time Congress tried to put a 0.7% tax on the Millionaires.....you'd think they stole their lunch money. That's $7000 for you Math Majors out there.

Let's go back to the Clinton Tax Rates.......but let's also cut back to Clinton's Spending Rate, which was less than half of the current Budget.

Reply

Gary Junstrom

10:49 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Well put Maryann. While I am not rich(well maybe to Obama I am) I aspire to be, and I want my kids to be as rich as their talents and efforts will allow them to become. That's why I have one wife, two kids, don'tt abuse drugs or alcohol and work as hard as I can. Many of the so-called poor have more kids than Heinz has pickles, smoke, drink and do drugs, get tattoos and piercings, drop out of school and break the law. And to think, to Obama, the rich are the problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe R

11:55 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

Nice way to demonize, swiftboat, stigmatize and slime poor people, most of whom are hard working. Some of the poor are retired people on fixed incomes. The poor can't hire armies of lobbyists to buy off politicians as the billionaires can. Why do conservatives hate poor people so much?

Comment_arrow

John Q. Public

7:16 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012

It's ironc, Joe R, but collectively, middle income conservatives voluntarily contribute far more $$$ than all liberals, including the wealthy. One of those inexplicable facts of life, that when it comes to voluntary giving, conservatives are the poor's best friend.

Joe R

10:49 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

The rich could not have achieved what they did without an infrastructure paid for by all tax payers. Trickle down is a big joke but thanks for the laugh. Eyeballs calls me a communist while the real plutocrats are shipping jobs to communist countries like China and Viet Nam. Doesn't that make them commie lovers? Walmart and the other big box stores are wall to wall with commie Chinese products, now who's the communist? If all these Chinese products were stamped with Made In Communist China instead of just China, I wonder how all the Ayn Rand crowd and libertarians would feel? Oh wait, when it comes to money they are totally amoral and don't care if they trade with a communist or not. But when a decent American talks about rich people and big corporations paying their fair share in taxes some ignorant know nothing Fox News listening Rush Limbaugh wannabe labels said person a communist. Unreal. The earth will come to an end if the top 1% is taxed at a 39.6% rate instead of 35%. Was IKe a commie, the top marginal tax rate was 91% in the 1950s and he strengthened Social Security and he was not anti-union. In her declining years, that psychopath Ayn Rand signed up for Social Security and Medicare. Ms Atlas Shrugged was a rabid atheist and felt that religion was incomaptible with her brand of capitalism. Alan Greenspan was and probably still is a big fan of hers.

Reply

Gary Junstrom

1:38 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Hey Joe R - you left out your idol's favorite line "you didn't build that.". And MARC Lombardi - stop with the tired liberal talking points. The oil companies make less profit percentagewise than many corporations including drug companies and they also make less on a gallon of gas than the government does in taxes. Their profits are up because worldwide demand is up for their product which, by the way, is safe, efficient, plentiful and legal. All reasons why liberals are against it. I have an idea - if you detest the oil companies so much, why don't you produce a better product and put them all out of business? That is the beauty of capitalism - you are free to compete and do what Americans have done for centuries - make the world a better place through innovation and ingenuity. Do it before socialism is fully installed.

Reply

frank rizzo

11:55 pm on Saturday, December 29, 2012

eyeballs sounds like the typical hayseed stuck in front of the tv watching sean hannity. newsflash eyeballs clinton wasnt a commie but he did have the most successful economy since world war 2 as well as creating more non govt jobs than reagan, daddy bush and bush jr combined . he taxed the rich an extra 3% . bush jr did away with that and in a few years we ended up giving wall st trillions for their incompetence. but no john q public has a much better answer by taxing the hell out of that kid working in mc donalds. no wonder we are doomed.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eyeballs

2:19 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Explaining economics to someone whose mind is so undeveloped would be impossible. The economy was good under Clinton despite his policies and would have done even better without them - and it goes back to Reagan, whether you like it or not. I understand Joe R is looking for more speakers at the next Communist Party Meeting. I'll tell him to sign you up, Comrad!

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

11:28 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Clinton just happened be in office during one of the country's most important periods in history, the technology age of the computer, the dot.com era and boost of all the new companies that were born and launched along with the record climb of Wall St. because of everyone investing and trading in this new era.

frank rizzo

3:42 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

yeah reagan. a president who raised the debt ceiling 18 times , gave weapons to the taliban to fight russians and gave 4 million illegals amnesty without any criminal check. if reagan were alive today republicans would call him comrade too. only someone like eyeballs could give us a gem like " yeah clinton's policies were good but they would have been better without him" . eyeballs you should check i think theres a carbon monoxide leak in your living room.

Reply

frank rizzo

3:42 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

gary junston oil is safe? you must have missed the news about that trouble in the gulf 2 yrs ago. i heard there was some kind of spill. THAT WENT ON 4 MONTHS. you didnt build that was an accurate statement. those corporations didnt build the roads and bridges that allowed their trucks to deliver their goods. wake up already.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Q. Public

7:16 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012

The taxpayers, the top 5%, built those road, and bridges, so they could deliver their goods. Their taxes financed it, and their companies did the work. The government devours the wealth of the people, consuming much and redistributing the rest, but they produce nothing.

frank rizzo

3:42 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

obama wanted to rebuild the 77,000 crumbling roads and bridges in this country and eyeballs and gary called him a socialist. funny how they never said a peep when george bush built roads and bridges in iraq for a trillion bucks. hey at least they have a starbucks in bagdad now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Q. Public

7:16 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Frank, you must have been out of the country. GWB was severely criticized by conservatives for spending in Iraq, and elsewhere. Despite his vast increases in domestic, safety-net spending, he was blasted as heartless by liberals, and a big-spender by his base. Bad move for GWB, as he lost that base, and the opposition is, well, the opposition, despite his dancing to their music. There's a lesson to be learned by all conservatives: you can't appease the left, as their needs are infinite and their memory short.

Dentss Dunnagun

11:28 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

America is rapidly becoming a nation of takers. An increasing number of Americans expect the government to take care of them from the cradle to the grave, and they expect the government to dig into the pockets of others in order to pay for it all. In one state there are 139 "takers" for every 100 private sector workers. The American people have become absolutely addicted to government money, and it gets worse with each passing year. It would be one thing if we could afford all of this spending, but unfortunately we simply cannot. We are drowning in debt, and we are stealing more than a hundred million more dollars from future generations with each passing hour. No bank robber in history can match that kind of theft There is no way in the world that we could raise taxes high enough to pay for all of the obligations that we are currently taking on. They say that even if we taxed all corporations and all individuals at a 100% tax rate on all income over $66,193, it wouldn't be nearly enough to fund the over $8 trillion per year in the growth of U.S. liabilities....this is going to end very badly for us and especially our kids

Reply

Wilson B Goode

11:28 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Bill Clinton increased the national debt by 40 percent during his 8 years. He also brought us the dot.com bubble which was largely responsible for the economy's success. Those evil corporations did so well Joe r that the stock market grew making lots of people money. If the evil corporations didn't do so well how would stocks perform? Btw. Evil corporations invest in and buy goods from other evil corporations which allow everyone to have jobs. They also pay dividends which are taxed a 2nd time upon receipt. They also have shareholders who want a return on capital or why invest, without investment there are no businesses.

Rizzo. If obummy wants to fix roads and bridges where is the proposal for a bill? Look at how fast other junk gets passed. Btw how are we gonna pay for roads and bridges when we have a trillion dollar budget hole and 20 trillion in debt? Steal it from Medicare like Obamacare?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe R

12:32 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012

So we let the roads and bridges go to hell? You will be the first one screaming if a bridge collapses, especially a bridge for railroad tanker cars full of toxic chemicals. You will be the first one screaming if you lose a wheel in a pot hole. The right wing solution is to cut the top marginal tax rate from 35% to 25%, even less revenue and trickle down hasn't ever worked, the Bush era proves that. The only president to cut taxes in a time of war. Bush put everything on the credit card.

Comment_arrow

Joe T

2:08 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

@Joe R of course we should fix them so where is the proposal from BO and congress to do so? He's been POTUS for 4 years. Point me in the direction of a bill pending to fix them.

And where will the funds come from since we don't have any money to spend? You veer off course and attack tax rates but you neglect to mention that individual inc taxes paid after Bush cuts hit a record high in 2007 when we also had 4.5% unemployment. If Bush put everything on a credit card, then Obama must be using one card to pay off each other card that is tapped out. Since BO was sworn in he added $6 trillion to the debt. It's a shame that the facts don't lie but feel free to make excuses, duck the real problem which is spending and make up stories.

Go ahead and raise the rates on the rich. The $80B a year will pay for a week's worth of Obama spending and still won't fix any roads or bridges or create any jobs.

Then what will you use as an excuse for failure?

If we borrow to pay for government but won't cut government spending, then what?

In 2008, Obama said the debt was irresponsible and unpatriotic when everyone owed $30k each. now we all owe over $50k each. Is it still irresponsible and unpatriotic?

FACT - when you hit the debt ceiling, it means you have maxed out your borrowing capacity and have not paid back the principal.

Who thinks the solution to this is to borrow more money?

Joe R

11:28 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Check, got it. Eyeballs and Gary love pollution, want more pollution, want the air, water and soil tainted beyond hope, beyond repair. They think that Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are commie plots and must be eliminated. These two yahoos have no one, no relatives on any of those programs so they do not care. They are against public schools or any schools getting public money because you know, that's socialism. All schools should be private and if you can't afford schooling then tough luck. Police should be privatized because we can't have those socialized police. No more funding for roads because what we have now is socialism for roads. That is, public money is confiscated to build roads in other states, that's socialism. The list goes on.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eyeballs

7:16 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012

Reading your posts is cute, kind of like when a 5 year old begins to state opinions, no matter how ridiculous they are. I've never seen anyone post so much with such little knowledge about anything. Most socialists and communists are either really young and immature with little life experience and there's the really sad type of people like you. But I don't blame you - you need to live off the more productive in society, given your limitations.

Joe R

11:28 am on Sunday, December 30, 2012

The army is socialism on steroids, the VA is socialized medicine. The two Neanderthals would eliminate the VA or privatize it and thus many veterans would not get any medical care unless they could afford it. The GI Bill is socialism, according to the standards of these two yahoos. Eyeballs is busy ironing his blood splattered white sheets.

Reply

Wilson B Goode

7:16 pm on Sunday, December 30, 2012

How come John Kerry owns muni bonds and doesnt pay his fair share of taxes? He also owns stock in wall street and invests in Bain capital. Let's give him the same treatment we gave mittens. Look at his investments. What a crook

http://pfds.opensecrets.org/N00000245_2010.pdf

Reply

Joe R

5:59 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

@mtwnres: Yes, their taxes are high but they get significant value for their money, so in the final analysis, they come out ahead. They have universal health care, which is free (some very minor fees in some cases) at the point of service. How many Americans are burdened with huge premiums (that amounts to a big tax) that skyrocket every year and many Americans go bankrupt from medical expenses every year (that amounts to a huge tax). No one goes bankrupt from medical expenses in Germany or Canada or Australia or FRance or Norway or Denmark. University education in Germany is virtually free or very inexpensive. US kids are burdened with confiscatory tuitions (that amounts to a huge tax) and further burdened with student loan debts for years (that amounts to a huge tax). Medicines are significantly cheaper in Germany, unlike America where the exact same medicines can be twice or three times as expensive (another huge "TAX") for Americans. They get many other services that we can only dream about. They have a very good public transportaion infrastructue and system so that many folks don't even need to own cars or can use their cars less. I'm sure you won't get the point I'm trying to make because I didn't supply illustrations and video clips.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mtwnres

6:37 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

@JoeR - They come out for ahead in your opinion. Essentially, you want the government to play nanny for you.
Americans going bankrupt from medical is nothing more then BS propoganda. Has been debunked time and again.
Why do people like yoiu insist on saying something is free? Do the doctors work for no pay in Europe ? How about the college professors ?
Did I miss that in the news reports ?
And yes, many countries now charge a small premium in addition to the taxes collected to cover that "free" healthcare. Germany charges 8% of wages.

What services do they get that I could only dream about ? Please enlighten me ?

PS - I work with Europeans, I've worked there, and I have family that still lives there. So spare me the BS remarks about where I get my info.

Fae Danner

5:59 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

As I read all of these blogs, including my own, I am reminded of two things: #1. It's great to vent, although a modicum of kindness and acceptance for the thoughts and expressions of others are always a welcome method of having a meaningful discussion. #2. Regardless of our perspective on any issue, we are powerless; and the more distracted we become by in-fighting, the fewer battles we have any hope of resolving. Honestly, I think the war is over and none of us has won. Division was the goal and it has succeeded ... and continues. I'm older, wiser, and sad!

Reply

Joe R

6:29 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

It just amazes me that we don't think twice about being taxed for something like public roads and the infrastructure. We pool all our tax money for a greater good and everyone benefits from having safe drivable roads. Some part of my federal taxes go for roads in other states via the interstate highway system and vice-versa for the residents in those states chipping in for roads that cross through NJ. But if we would do the same for health care, that's socialism, that's horrible, blah, blah, blah. I guess they also think that Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the VA (it is an example of the "S" word) are all socialism and so should be demolished.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mtwnres

10:18 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Because many of us believe the less the government is involved in the better our lives will be. I'm pretty sure there were some really smart men that thought that way a few hundred years ago. But I could be wrong.

stephen

9:09 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Very useful information. Thanks for the tips. These should stay up on Patch in a visible spot until Tax Day.

Reply

Leave a comment

The Little Silver-Oceanport Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks