patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Sequestration Could Bring Big Cuts To NJ Education, Environment, Health Care

White House details what each state stands to lose if $85 billion in spending cuts take effect on March 1.

 

Funding for education in New Jersey would be slashed by nearly $30 million and drastic cuts made to health care programs and environmental protection should Congress fail to halt $85 billion in "sequestration" spending cuts scheduled to take hold March 1, the White House said Sunday.

The federal government would save $75 million by furloughing 11,000 civilian military contractors, and another $59 million by cutting funding to military bases. 

The cuts would include:  

  • Approximately $11.7 million in funding for primary and secondary education.
  • About $17 million in funds for about 210 teachers, aides, and staff who help children with disabilities.
  • Head Start and Early Head Start services would be eliminated for approximately 1,300 children.
  • New Jersey would lose about $4,891,000 in environmental funding, and $472,000 in grants for fish and wildlife protection.
  • Approximately 11,000 civilian Department of Defense employees would be furloughed.
  • Army base operation funding would be cut by about $52 million in New Jersey. Funding for Air Force operations in New Jersey would be cut by about $7 million.
  • New Jersey will lose about $336,000 in Justice Assistance Grants.
  • Up to 600 disadvantaged and vulnerable children could lose access to child care.
  • Around 3,930 fewer children will receive vaccines.
  • New Jersey will lose approximately $840,000 in funds to help upgrade its ability to respond to public health threats including infectious diseases, natural disasters, and biological, chemical, nuclear, and radiological events.New Jersey will lose about $2,330,000 in grants to help prevent and treat substance abuse, resulting in around 3100 fewer admissions to substance abuse programs. And the New Jersey State Department of Health and Senior Services will lose about $752,000 resulting in around18,800 fewer HIV tests.
  • New Jersey could lose up to $187,000 in funds that provide services to victims of domestic violence, resulting in up to 700 fewer victims being served.
  • Nutrition Assistance for Seniors: New Jersey would lose approximately $488,000 in funds that provide meals for seniors.

The total federal spending cuts would be about $1.2 trillion over the next nine years. Republicans have accused the president of using the impending cuts for political gain.

President Obama's plan asks for increased tax revenues to offset some of the trillion-dollar cuts.

Related Topics: sequestration

Ken

12:36 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

College in New Jersey is expensive enough, we definitely do not need cuts there.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Booradley

9:38 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

If you notice Obama can take your tax dollars and tell you he won't be giving you any money back because he can't figure out how to live within his means. How about cutting half of those desk jobs in Washington, DC? How many czars do we need? How many people does it take to run HHS, Education (who do nothing to improve education), Interior, Agriculture? This is nothing but politics and us little guys end up getting hurt -- including college students.

Richard Chimento

12:55 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

O no the world is ending! Tell me how these cuts can hurt so much when our deficit is 500 billion more than it was back in 2008? Don't believe the sky is falling, they could find places to cut that wouldn't hurt much (there is a government report on 125 billion in wasted spending that they ignore). If these cuts really do cause problems its because they want it to, so that they make people believe there is reason to keep spending levels high. We have a 3.7 trillion dollar budget, 1 trillion plus deficit, do the math, these cuts are a drop in the bucket.

Reply
Comment_arrow

wookfish

8:05 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

You want huge cuts...tell Mrs Obummer no more vacations with the whole family

Comment_arrow

Richard Koping

8:53 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

The cuts will hurt because it is an across the board cut. Every item gets cut. If all the agencies were allowed to make the cuts, they could do so easily, but the legislation was so poorly written, no discretion is allowed. An epic fail, kick the can down the road decision by the Administration that is now trying to pass the blame.

Eric Bolton

2:07 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Obama and his buddies are crying wolf and most of the intelligent populace know that. If this nation cannot prune 1.5% off its expenditures, then something is seriously wrong. What is wrong is that Obama knows only asking for tax increases; he does not know how to comprehend reducing expenditures. He really needs to be replaced, by any means possible.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dozer Dave

7:10 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Do you think Bush s war in Iraq based on lies was a good investment?
Any idea how much money was wasted?
Cut All Foreign Aid

Comment_arrow

westfieldmom

7:23 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Hey Dozer Dave, is this ever going to be Obama's problem? When will you stop blaming Bush? Democrats voted for that war too. Newsflash, this sequestration was Obama's idea.

Comment_arrow

Mrgrumpass

8:10 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Dozer
This is BHO's problem, he engineered it, if BHO had been doing his job and created a Budget for 41/2 years as he should have there would not be this problem! This is not a Golf game your empty suit should be in the oval office working on it not playing games in Fla.!

Comment_arrow

BobDee

9:00 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

lol...Bush,,,what was that like 10yrs ago??? Wake up.

Comment_arrow

South End

1:00 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Dozer - John Kerry, in his first week as SoS, cried that you CANT CUT FOREIGN AID.

So lets recap: State can't cut foreign aid. The Right can't cut Defense. The Left can't cut social programs. That leaves us with ???????

Ken

5:34 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Let's really call it was it is, our government is not cutting any spending. They are not going to have as large an increase in spending over last year then they wanted to. To put it in a way most people understand if
Last year they spent $1.00
This year they wanted to spend $1.10
The cuts are telling them they can only spend $1.05.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TheGreatHoax

10:31 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

You got it Ken! Enough of the games from the lousy politicians. Their power & money is all they care about. All you BHO adoring fans, wake up, the guy couldn't care less about you or your family. He's all about bringing down the USA. Quit believing the Govt run media talking points. The govt has ENOUGH of our money.

Duffer

6:47 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

If you believe the government is going to cut spending you are a fool.

Reply

TRman

7:02 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Why dont they have the automatic cuts start on Welfare/foodstamp programs first?
Why because the average taxpayer would be happy about it and they would lose their political issue.

Also it is not a taxcut Ken is correct.

Reply
Comment_arrow

gjc

8:06 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Don't speak for me or any average taxpayer. We have hearts and would never cut where the need is greatest. On the other hand I would vote to cut anything you or your family deems "essential" like your next vacation.

Comment_arrow

wookfish

8:13 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

drug tests for all welfare slugs

Comment_arrow

NotDifficult

8:22 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

wookfish - "Required drug tests for people seeking welfare benefits ended up costing taxpayers more than it saved and failed to curb the number of prospective applicants, data used against the state in an ongoing legal battle shows."

Data from our favorite state- Florida

http://www.tampabay.com/news/courts/florida-didnt-save-money-by-drug-testing-welfare-recipients-data-shows/1225721

Comment_arrow

jerseyswamps

8:39 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

If the "average taxpayer" had any idea how much waste, fraud and abuse there is in the current welfare/food stamp program I assure you they would be screaming for cuts in the programs.

Comment_arrow

TRman

9:47 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

gjc, I hate to point out the obvious but I pay for my vacations with MY MONEY not taxpayer handouts.

Welfare was intended to be TEMPORARY help not a lifestyle like it has become.

the FREE S**t ARMY handout era needs to end

Dozer Dave

7:22 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Gov Christie s 2% cap isn't really a 2% cap either
Besides calling out Republicons in congress and calling out teacher what has Gov Cheesesteak really done?
and No getting his friends jobs at the PA doesn't count
either does no bid contracts set up by happy Gilmore to fleece the tax payers so they could put 300 k into the republicon super pac doesn't count either
Funny I don't see any tax cut from the Christie Admin

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrgrumpass

8:11 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Dozer
This is BHO's problem, he engineered it, if BHO had been doing his job and created a Budget for 41/2 years as he should have there would not be this problem! This is not a Golf game your empty suit should be in the oval office working on it not playing games in Fla.!

Comment_arrow

BobDee

9:02 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

What the hell's Cheesesteak got to with this??? Wake up.

Donna Griffin

7:42 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Hmmm....if sequestration was such a bad idea, why did President Obama come up with the plan prior to the election? It's disgusting. Additionally, it isn't a cut at all. It is a "decrease" in the rate of additional spending. If we ran our homes the way our elected officials run our country, our children would be hungry and we wouldn't have a roof over our heads. Continue playing golf, Mr. President. I never thought that the hope and change you promised the American people actually meant lose all hope and change for the worse.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrgrumpass

8:23 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Donna this shows how simple minded 53% of the people are, in 100years they will be looking at the history books saying, The first Black President nice man good father good personality master at maculating the media, divided the country and totally failed at the job !

Comment_arrow

Donna Griffin

9:05 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Mrgrumpass - Let's not forget, great manipulator and divider as well. The fate of this nation is stark...and it is far more due to the lack of accountability demanded by the American public than any one person holding the office of presidency. We have the educational system to thank for the lack of civics lessons. To arm the populace with intelligence would cause us all to realize that the emperor is in fact without clothes.

Comment_arrow

Enuf Already

8:27 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

I believe Obama wants the sequestration to happen. The more he makes the sheep believe that the sky will fall, the more credible he'll sound when the slightest little blip on the economic radar appears. Then he can preach, See! The GOP got what they wanted and look what happened. NOW it's MY turn. Then he'll spend MORE! Its all a ruse! Obama's legacy may be that he was the most polarizing president in recent history, but his "spin team" was brilliant! And the real bad consequence is, is that the Republicans don't know how to counter.

Dentss Dunnagun

8:05 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Very simply put Obama wanted to put of the debt ceiling talks till after the election budget so Jack Lew suggested, Obama approved, Reid inserted into "compromise" legislation. Simple explanation. President brashly attempts to strong-arm opposition into giving him his way, and opposition says, "eh, not so much. Your scheme, you deal with it. Get serious about compromise, instead of demanding a tax increase every few weeks, and we can talk. The good times of the bottomless MasterCard are over"

Obama created the current situation, and as Chief Executive, controls just how severe the impact will be in any given area. So, let's see how he does, hmmm?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dozer Dave

9:34 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

lol kinda like it wasn't bush fault he handed Obama the 2 unpaid for wars and a depression?
How many of you folks have fema claims in?
Very simply republicons live in denial and out of touch with reality
you want cuts great cut foreign aid and the bloated military budget for starters
close corp tax loop holes
audit the state
try this
google poorest states and your find they are red states
google worst states for education and you will also find they are red states
republicons ran ppl for office who believe fema was immoral bashed 47 % ers who are really republicons were in favor of vaginal probes and legit rape lol scary

Comment_arrow

type writer

9:47 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Dozer...Obama is spending the same as Bush did on the "wars" after promising to end them. The Iraq war is still going on even though Obama and the press have told us it is over. The USA is building military bases and outposts across the world and Obama is doing it.
Now if Bush borrowed and spent an extra 1.2 trillion dollars a year like Obama has been doing, Bush would not have had the problems at the end of his term. Obama is just pushing off the problems to the next pesident.
About the few crazyrepublicans that run, yes, they are nutty, but no less nutty than the crazy democrats, including Joe Biden, that keep getting elected. The democrat run media only shows the whacky republicans andtheir staements, they NEVER show the truly crazy and bizzare democrats tha keep getting elected like Bobby Rush from Illinois and many others like him. Google his gaffes. I bet u never hard of him.

Comment_arrow

BobDee

9:04 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Q: What's the difference between Bush and Obama?
A: Nothing

sp resident

8:15 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

After you all spend all the money the American people has to pay the price! Probably can't wait to retire to receive that big, fat government pension? I'll just keep an eye out for when my property tax has to increase. Thank you.

Reply

Ann Powers

8:57 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Why is the media simply regurgitating Obama's nonsense w/o checking facts? Do the math. A 2.4 percent cut shouldn't result in such draconian reductions. He's trying to scare the public so -- once again -- he can get what he wants! Truth is, we need more than a 2.4 percent cut.
BTW, interesting how Michelle O was selected to "appear" at the Oscars. Haven't yet seen any story about how much that dress cost, unlike all similar reporting on Ann Romney's attire.
The US media is a disgrace.

Reply
Comment_arrow

type writer

9:19 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Thats government lies for you. The feds spend 3 trillion on what, and then say they must cut essential services if th spend a few billion less. Obama spends 1 billion just travelling around in his jet.
Its the same with local governments. They say they will have to cut police and public works to save 1 million dollars but they will build a 20 million dollar marina and playground at the same time. All liars and thieves. Hoe about the feds cutting the secret serviceand million dollar perks to Bill Clinton and his family. They are gazzilionaires now that they are collecting all their payoffs and insider deals.

Comment_arrow

Mrgrumpass

12:42 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Slippery Slope
I am sorry to correct you but it's our plain he is playing billionaire on!

River City Rover

9:11 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

The reality is social security deductions went up 2% January 1st. The sequestration cut is going to be just over 2%. If the average family can bite the bullet, why can't Tax and Spend Obama?? After sequestration was his idea from the beginning. He talks out of both sides of his mouth and is ruining our Great Nation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dozer Dave

9:41 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

ya might wanna try and use some facts before placing blame on black jesus
try google bush v Obama vacations

the ss deduction went back to what it was in order to fund it
Republicons lost deal with it

now what exactly has Christie done?
has your property taxes gone down? nope
tolls? nope

yes dems voted for bush war in Iraq what they didn't know it was all lies ask colin powell

Comment_arrow

wookfish

10:30 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Bush vs Obama vacations you're kidding right? yeah Bush went to His ranch inTexas alot, and rode bike,and cut firewood and CARRIED ON GOVERNMENT business.....He didn't take THIRTY plus family members to Spain...more golf then Tigger Woods, hell they had to chace his ass off the coarse to watch the seals take down obama bin-laden...he doesn't leave town every single time there is a pressing issue....hell he's never there at all....and world policy.. a joke.

type writer

9:13 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Michelle Obama has the time and money to preset an oscar award but they have to cut medical services for poor people. Marie Antoinette anyone?
Why are the Obamas , democrats and Hollywood liberals against the second ammendment and want to ban guns, but they glorify the most violent, blood soaked movies made? The liberals must LOVE gun violence and murder and blood and guts because they get all goose bumps and excited when they watch it. Every day and night. Hw can anyone be horrified by a real life school shooting but then go and watch the same garbage on the movie screen? hypocrites and phonies, that is the only explanation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Johnjcpa

12:40 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

She spent a lot less money than Chris and MaryPat did to attend the same dinner for the governors. Aa a legal gun owner that happens to like action movies and yet has never felt the need to shoot school children or movie patrons, why would you give up the first amendment when it serves to protect the second amendment.
If you have trouble separating the movies from real life, than don't be a gun owner. Or more importantly, someone around you needs to limit your access to weapons.

Comment_arrow

type writer

2:11 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

@johnjcpa...John,....Your statement is all over the place John and has little to do with my comment, but for arguments sake, answer me this. Do YOU enjoy watching people get slaughtered and riddled with bullets in movies, while their faces are torn off and blood is flowing every where? I sure don't. Is the corrulation between violence in movies and violence in real life any different than the corrulation between advertising for smoking, eating and drinking and the consumption of these in real life? The liberals blame Joe Camel, Ronald McDonald and The Marlboro man for children and adults smoking addictions and obesity. Why are liquor, hard alcohol and cigarette tobacco ads banned from television and movie theaters? Can't people watch the ads without going out and buying these products? For the record, I live in reality. That is why I do not need phony Hollywood liberals to entertain me like you do. I am also not a gun owner but I am a strong believer in the Constitution and the 2nd amendment and the first.

Comment_arrow

Jane Doe

12:19 pm on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

There was a time when violence, gore, smut & curses were understood to be addicting crap, & were censored. That was billed as Big interfering nanny gov't by conservatives, who have been cutting funds to FCC, NEA & anything else standing between media corporate pimps & their hapless johns since the 1980's.

Dozer Dave

9:54 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

no slope the difference is one is reality (ppl getting killed) the other in fantasy
where most republicons live

kinda like blind faith in Gov Tele Tubby with this move with the help of happy Gilmore
Citing an emergency, the state did not make competitive contracts for cleanup work available to local officials until late last month, about 90 days after Sandy inflicted historic damage. A total of 43 towns have operated under the no-bid contract for those three months, paying rates that were in many cases considerably higher than towns that did not hire AshBritt.

The fleecing of the American ppl continues

Reply

Uncle Moe

10:08 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

CUT IT ALL! The government has no business doing half of what it does. It is not ethical to steal someone else's wealth for these no good section 8'ers and welfare queens. So much waste! It might hurt some, but this government spending needs to be cut to the bone! Taxation is slavery. Slavery was never ended, but only EXTENDED TO EVERYONE!

Reply

Mike

10:54 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

The Federal Govt borrows, against our credit and future taxes, about 40% of the budget. The sequestration cuts are a good but small start, no more. Without reforming Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid, we are all in for a very ugly surprise someday, and that day is getting closer all the time. The government has taken our treasure, spent it, and has made promises to us all that it cannot keep.

Reply

oldsoldier

11:16 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

This should be a prime example to everyone that we do not need the Department of Education. That Department should be abolished, and let the states run their educational systems. In my opinion, we in New Jersey should only have to pay for New Jersey's school system, not California or any other states. The people of the other states should have the same attitude on this as well.

Reply

Spooner

11:21 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

The Republicans have changed their strategy according to today's NYT. They are now supporting defense cuts, putting the onus on the President to make his next move. Remember that Sequestration when it hits home, prevents those that are affected, from pointing fingers specifically at their elected officials. They will all blame Obama & Congress. Hopefully this doesn't back fire in their faces( the Republicans) forcing people who want government largesse(defense spending for one) to demand higher taxes to pay for them...Now you could debate the economic utility of jobs and services the Government provides, but that'll be like going into a hornet's nest being bit from everywhere, including doing your own?

Reply
Comment_arrow

CaffeAmante Coffee Roasters & Tea

3:50 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Luckily we have a President who has the executive authority to pick and choose where the cuts come from - considering the whole thing was his idea.
Oh wait.. there is no accounts because there is no budget because he doesn't know how to do that. shux - I forgot.. Oh well, I guess It really is those Bad Repuublicans...

Mrgrumpass

12:48 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

I can cut 2% easy hell I could cut 5% out of the budget, simple over the past 4 ½ years cut ALL the pork on ALL the bills pass through the house and signed off by BHO!

Reply

Opinionated

1:07 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

When the President was on TV with those emergency workers in the background, I got the impression he was using them as hostages to get his way. The "cuts" to be made seem to have a lot more affect than what the dollar figures would indicate. Is this a form of "State Sponsored Terrorism"? Then what does that make Obama? What does that say about the DNC? What does say about those who voted this man into office? I know what it says about those who want to still blame Bush. Answer: they miss him very much. I don't though.

Reply

Brad Schaeffer

2:55 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

As anyone who runs even a small business can tell you, often the bottom line is bled to death by a thousand cuts (or in this case costs) rather than one big expense. With that in mind, consider the Obama's Christmas vacation to Hawaii: The cost to U.S taxpayers of flying one man, his wife, two daughters and a dog to Hawaii is estimated at $3,639,622. For purposes of comparison, the total bill for flying the entire Royal Family (Queen, princes, dukes, the works) around the world for a year is £4.7 million – or about enough for two Obama vacations.

Obama seethes at "the 1%" for not paying their "fair share" but when you consider that "he lives not like the 1% but rather that ".00001%" as Mark Steyn noted, can you blame taxpayers for balking at handing over even more of their sweat and toil before being satisfied that in a budget in the trillions no one can find $109b (or whatever it is depending on the day) or >2.7% of the 2013 budget (and a mere 10% reduction in the $900b deficit) in under the cushion change that will not have a noticeable impact on our quality of life that now seems so dependent upon the good graces of the Lords of Emerald City, DC?

When his General in front of Richmond, George McClellan, had more troops than he could possibly need to take the city, he kept demanding of Lincoln more and more anyway...Lincoln said that "sending McClellan reinforcements is like shovelling fleas across a barn...not half of them get there." I feel that way about taxes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

I have spoken

11:02 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

BEWARE...MY COMPUTER ID'd THIS AS SPYWARE....BEWARE

CaffeAmante Coffee Roasters & Tea

3:45 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

All this fear mongering is quite entertaining. Only the 'low knowledge voter' would think this will really do what Obama claims it will do.
Lets see: $800 Billion dollar stimulus AND 1.2 Trillion in additional spending has done absolutely nothing by way of economic recovery and unemployment reduction YET - $86B (which the US Gov't spends in 72 hours anyway) is catostrophic??

The best thing that can happen is that we do absolutely nothing and let the cuts take effect so everyone can see that the only problem we have is a President who cannot cut any spending.
... besides.. did you know (probably not) Obama has the Executive authority to pick and choose the accounts where the cuts will come from? Did you also know the sequestration was his idea? See what happens when our President is not accountable for submitting a budget in each of his 4 years? He is supposed to say - take from this account, and trim that account, but leave the education account alone. Too bad he never had the ability to manage anything.
... I rest my case.

Reply

Donna Griffin

3:59 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Brad Schaeffer - You've hit the proverbial nail on the head and did so very eloquently. There is no intent to cut the rate of growth (which in actuality is all that we are speaking of). There appears to be not one budget saving measure that can be implemented without our nation falling into ruin. We, in the private sector, have been cutting our small business expenses nearly daily for the last 4 years. We are accountable to our bottom line. There is no moral outrage from Washington over the job and salary cuts we've been dealing with in our small businesses. Why is it that the sky is falling only when federal and state jobs are on the line? To whom are the President and Congress accountable? I say CUT until it hurts. No new taxes should be implemented because it is simply like handing more crack cocaine to an addict. This is not an issue of which party has the answers. It is an issue of neither party having the guts to do what we must to save our financial future for our children. Cowards....every last one of them!

Reply

Steve Glaspey

4:10 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Until we implement true campaign reform and term limits - trying to stop government spending is like trying to shovel mercury with a pitchfork. I can clearly see the problem but have no easy answers.

Reply

Dentss Dunnagun

4:18 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Think of it this way New Jersey is one of the states that get back the least money from the government so therefore the cuts should not be of any concern to us ....we could all use a little more belt tightening and a lot less the sky is falling .......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

4:56 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

According to the government: they say that there are about 11,000 jobs that are defense related, just in one area in NJ. Those employees will be furrowed. So to say that cuts there will have no effect, is not true. Another point: there will be reductions in FEMA money, which will have an effect on those requiring that agency's assistance in NJ. There will be cuts to education, requiring either those monies to be made up by local taxes or possibly doing away with or cutting back on programs funded by the Federal government. So I await the Sequestration next month too.

Comment_arrow

Donna Griffin

1:30 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Spooner - Actually, the term is "furlowed" and the latest reports indicate that the "cuts" in Defense Department positions actually translate into effected employees going to a 4-day work week rather than the traditional 5-day week. We desperately need to make cuts and NO ONE in Washington can agree as to where those should occur. Since Sequestration was the President's proposal prior to the election, surely he should be a man of his word and follow through in lieu of the last 4 years without a federal budget.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

11:33 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Donna- bringing up old wounds are you...we've tangled before over SCOTUS rulings. I just love how yous balkanize and compartmentalize "sequestration" . . .as if it was pulled out of a bottle and put on the table by the Obama administration! Please don't insult our intelligence...sequestration came about as an alternate to default, but in your mind bent...you would have preferred default? It is obvious from your off the cuff remarks(cut, cut, cut) that you have know understanding of macroeconomics, until cut, cut, cut personally affects you and/or your family's livelihood. Those thousands of ship yard workers down in Newport News, VA would welcome you I'm sure.

Comment_arrow

Richard Chimento

1:20 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Spooner, there wouldn't have been any default. We have enough income going to the government to cover our debt obligations, Obama just has to make the decision to pay those obligations. A government shutdown would be preferable to whats in store for us if they don't stop bankrupting this country into a third world nation.

Comment_arrow

Spooner

1:50 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Richard- a new default would come if the Congress doesn't raise the debt ceiling. Yes there is money to pay the current debt. . .but it's the growing debt that continues to need reauthorization. Actually this sequester is all bull... to provide cover for the real meat and potato cuts...Social Security and Medicare. The Congress is attempting to use this sequester subterfuge to shaft the middle class with such dogged rhetoric, looking for for sympathy and understanding from the people. The truth of the matter is that the deficit as a percentage of GDP has been coming down with the tax increase...and has more of the bulk of baby boomers begin to draw down their retirement monies because of forced withdrawals, there will be even more tax revenue coming into the Treasury.

re-tired

5:22 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Time to pay up the for all they past debts . Five years into the latest" savior" there is no progress on anything that matters .We are still into counterfeiting money thru the fed . Any day now the world will realize we are a bankrupt country and our dollars will not be worth anything . In the meantime we will go on each side of our "great" political parties making more stupid laws to control the "sheeple" and get all they can out of us. There is no solution to our problem and a crash is inevitable ....

Reply
Comment_arrow

KC

1:27 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Oh my goodness has anyone noticed the drek they are trying to pass off as clothing and housegoods in stores like Burlington Coat Factory, Walmart, and JCPenny? It is like the world is coming to end for us even when we shop. We have the Cambodian immigrants who this their stuff is all the bomb. Then we have Nordstroms and Lord and Taylor. That is it. Everyone else has folded here in town. Marshalls about the only game left but a lot of their stuff is borderline too. We who cannot abide spending at Nordstroms are reduced to shopping at Target. Dear God hell will have to freeze over first. what a bunch of drek. The chinese aren't even trying to hide the fact that they are making the goods crappier than ever cause we still owe them money. I can sew better - and I can't sew really.

Opinionated

5:26 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Hey Folks, let's try a little math today! Sorry Obama supporters, this is too difficult for you to understand. So get your info from "The View". Now the subject is addition and subtraction. How much money did Facebook and General Electric avoid in paying taxes last year as a reward from Obama the hostage-taker? Now we add that to the $463M "tax return" (I prefer payback) that Facebook received. Now let's subtract that from this sequestration and what do we get? Now think of all of these people who are losing because GE and Facebook stole their money. Now we all know if Obama supporters read this and tried to think, their heads might explode like in "Scanners".

Reply

ML

5:45 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Could someone PLEASE explain to me what this has to do with horses???

Reply
Comment_arrow

KC

1:22 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Sequester NOT Equestrian
Speak the Kings English and tell them you need one of those teachers they are looking to lay off. ASAP.

Anna Token

5:56 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Fact - spending and increased budgets in these areas across the federal government has been over 18% since Obama started.

Now we need to cut 3%. Why all the crying? Government is too big and so fat we won't even feel this. Stop mortgaging my kids' futures!!!

Reply

Baywood

6:27 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

I Heart Sequestration!Cut it all!

Reply

KRaz

7:35 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

As a lucky DOD Civilian, I'll be furloughed for 22 days over the next 4 months ... why aren't our elected officials (who already make too much money) taking a pay cut? WTH???

Reply
Comment_arrow

I have spoken

11:04 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Take PTO....I'm a DOD Civ too and that's what I'm taking.

Comment_arrow

Richard Chimento

1:24 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

My job has had me on 4 day work weeks since last May due to the economy and slow sales. Sorry you have to take a hit, but we're all suppose to have "skin in the game" right?

KC

1:20 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Wait I know, Let's ask the corporations to bail us out! Verizon, Ford, City Bank, Skank of America. etc etc.

Reply

Concerned Westfield Citizen

8:45 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

More scare tactics. Too bad the Patch is regurgitating them.

Reply

Opinionated

8:46 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

There will be a problem with any bipartisan work because you have a president who makes a proposal that is agreed upon and then he says it's horrible and then blames it on the other party. But I fault the reps because they refuse the greatest threat to America, our freedom, and the future of our children is the Hostage-taker-in Chief! They are either too spineless or gullable to realize that. Save those poor emergency people, please!

Reply

John Hay

10:14 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Get you free desktop computer Sequestration Countdown Clock here:
http://www.orijinations.com/HTML/JH/Sequestration.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

I have spoken

11:05 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

**BEWARE, my computer ID'd this as SPYWARE...BEWARE

I have spoken

11:08 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Who cares.....Cut bloated teachers pay and government handouts. These are all long overdue to be cut.

Wanna save a tremendous amount of $, drug test all folks who collect welfare, foodstamps, SS Disability.

Reply

John Romano

11:42 am on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

....here's the REAL bottom line: You cannot properly build a Socialist regime by cutting spending. All those that 'have' must feel sorry for, and in turn, pay for all those that 'have not' ....until of course no one has anything ...then we're all equal ...and the czar at the top is content.

...of course ...as history has shown ...all those that are then equal in their "have not" status ....get really miffed and rise up to violently overthrow the czar.

Reply

Stinger

12:52 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Mr. President,
"No", is such an ugly word.
May I suggest you get used to hearing it and learn to work with what you have.

Best Regards,
Stinger

Reply

John B Taxpayer

6:21 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

The Patch is becoming a Junior white House Press Corp!
This is spit in the ocean $ were did the writer get this BS from?
This years budget adds $15 BILLION more that last year and now they have to reduce THAT increase by $85 million.
Misinformed voters will help obama's "Sky is Falling" mentality, But you at the Patch should be ashamed of yourselves for publishing this Bull!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Monk

7:57 am on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Sequestration = Increased spending just won't be as increased as Obama hoped. Now that's what I call fiscal responsibility in the face of a $16.5 trillion debt, sarcasm intended.

John Hay

9:46 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

New time left until Sequestration desktop countdown clock here:
http://www.orijinations.com/HTML/JH/Sequestration.html

Time left until Sequestration desktop countdown clock here: http://www.orijinations.com/HTML/JH/Sequestration.html

Reply

Dentss Dunnagun

12:59 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

If we can't even cut federal spending by 2.4 percent without much of the country throwing an absolute hissy fit, then what hope does America have? All of this whining and crying about the sequester is absolutely disgraceful. The truth is that even if the sequester goes into effect, the U.S. government will still take in more money than ever before in 2013 and it will still spend more money than ever before in 2013. So it is a bit disingenuous to call what is about to happen "a spending cut", but for the sake of argument let's concede that point. If this is how bad things are now, how bad will they be when a day of reckoning for our economy arrives? And a day of reckoning is coming. Our politicians can try to keep kicking the can down the road for as long as they can, but eventually time will run out. We can borrow our way to prosperity for a while, but in the end there is always a very bitter price to pay for doing so. I would love to tell you that there is a chance that all of this will be turned around, but the truth is that all of this whining and crying about the sequester shows that America is doomed.

Reply

SonOfLiberty

3:59 pm on Friday, March 1, 2013

Sequestration was Obama's idea back when he was campaigning for the most recent election and he threatened to veto ANYTHING the would stop it. Made him look like he was really tough on the budget and the deficit.

Now that he has been elected, he wants his spending back, and he uses the age old rhetoric of Chicken-Little-Speak to scare the People into thinking we are on the cusp of an economic and public service tragedy. Cops won't show up for hours when you call 911, houses will burn to the ground due to cuts in fire fighters, people will die from common accidents because of degradation in EMS Services, and children will starve because school lunch programs will be cut and parents are too stupid to figure out how to feed them.

Do you not even understand this is not an actual CUT in spending, it is just slowing the rate of growth. Even with sequestration we will still be spending more in 2013 than we did in 2012. It is like saying instead of spending $3.78 this year we are going to spend $3.74 which is still more then the $3.72 we spent last year. It is literally a 1% reduction in the RATE of spending growth. Are we really so fragile that the state of our national economy lies in the balance of a 1% reduction in the rate of Federal spending? If so, we have bigger problems, a.k.a. Greece anyone?

Obama OWNS this fabricated crisis!!!!

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Little Silver-Oceanport Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks