patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Everything You Wanted to Know About Full-Day Kindergarten in Little Silver

The district held an information night at Markham on Feb. 16 that brought out about 40 residents with lots of questions.

 

Members of the community volleyed all manner of questions and concerns at Dr. Carolyn Kossack, superintendent of Little Silver Schools, at a meeting held by the board of education Thursday night to discuss implementing full-day Kindergarten in the district.

About 40 residents attended the information session, which provided details on the upcoming vote on March 13 for a $750,000 bond referendum to build two classrooms at Point Road School to accommodate full-day Kindergarten, and questioned the superintendent about the timing and need for the program.

Residents expressed concern over the pending revaluation of borough properties, the district taking on more debt and whether Little Silver could continue to excel with the half-day Kindergarten program as education standards become more rigorous.

Debt Service vs. Operating Budget

The superintendent said that the vote in March was on whether to increase the district's debt service, which she compared to a mortgage that is taken out to make improvements and then paid off over time, and not part of the annual tax levy. It is separate from the operating budget that encompasses most other costs for running the district, like teacher salaries, utilities and supplies.

"Are you willing to pay $25 a year?" Kossack asked the audience. "That's the question on the table right now."

A 15-year bond at 2.931 percent based on the town's average assessed home value of $501,856 would result in an annual tax increase of $25.10 once the bonds are sold, likely by January 2013.

"This is a nominal increase for the average tax payer," said Kossack, who added that a survey of local realtors found that many potential buyers with young children are looking for full-day Kindergarten programs.

Grace Stoddard, a parent with three children in the district, asked how the hiring of two new teachers for the Kindergarten, along with increased supplies, heating and electric for the classrooms, wouldn't add to the district's operating budget.

Kossack said that the district's initiative to increase revenue -- through the summer enrichment program, facilities rental fees and non-resident tuition -- has resulted in the "equivalent of one teacher." Teachers will also begin paying more for their health care when they enter a new contract phase next year.

And ultimately, Kossack said, the operating budget needs to be kept within the two-percent cap or it would have to be put out for a vote to be approved by taxpayers.

March vote: "It doesn't feel right."

Many residents said they felt the vote in March was rushed and questioned whether it could be moved to November, which some reasoned would allow for the revaluation to be completed and possibly increase voter turnout.

"It doesn't feel right," said Rick Scott of the March vote, acknowledging that the school board was unaware of the upcoming revaluation when it decided to move forward with the referendum.

The decision in January by the borough's council to move forward with a proposed revaluation of Little Silver, with tax bills not due in mailboxes until this summer, has some residents concerned about rising taxes.

"You're asking us to vote when we don't know what we can afford," said Scott, who said that had he known when he bought his house on Point Road 20 years ago that taxes would increase about 400 percent, he would have bought some place else.

As reported by Patch, the board agreed in September to move forward with the March vote after a study of existing space determined the need for construction.

Board President Kevin Brennan said that the March vote allowed the district to take advantage of low interest rates and have the project completed by the start of the 2013-2014 school year. Pushing the election to November, which Brennan said he didn't even know was possible as the district had already filed with the county and state, would delay the program one year.

The board began to study the feasibility of full-day Kindergarten after it was targeted by the community as part of the five-year strategic plan in April 2008. A committee charged with investigating the program worked over a few years on researching and visiting full-day programs in neighboring towns. The district surveyed parents last summer about interest in a full-day program in Little Silver and found that 78 percent of respondents were in favor of it.

"This is not a new issue to Little Silver," said the superintendent. "The community will have to decide if the timing is right."

"How much better can we get?"

One thing most in the audience seemed to agree on was the excellence of the school district, which lead some to wonder why a full-day program was necessary when students consistently outperform neighboring schools in standardized tests.

"I'm not sure how much better we can get," said Scott, whose three children went through the district.

Nick Barbato, who said he'd lived in Little Silver for 30 years and opposed the referendum, said, "We've done pretty good without a full-day Kindergarten."

Kossack said, "Things are not the same as when we were in Kindergarten, or even three or five years ago."

She added, "There are new rigorous standards for our kids, and we have a limited time frame to teach them a lot of information."

Kossack also cited research in support of full-day Kindgergarten for creating a foundation for children's education.

"As the educational leader of this district," she said, "I think instructionally, it's the right thing to do."

Valerie Guerrero, who sends her Kindergarten-aged daughter to the full-day program at Leapfrog Learning Center in Shrewsbury this year, said that she did so because she did not want her child to fall behind other children who went out-of-district to full-day programs.

"As a mom, I wanted the best for my daughter," she said, and added that her family was willing to make sacrifices to afford that advantage. "I think it is am important thing for our children."

Editor's Note: The author served as a member of the Little Silver Board of Education from 2008-2011.

 

 

 

 

Related Topics: Dr. Carolyn Kossack, Little Silver Kindergarten, Little Silver School District, and full day kindergarten

Valerie

1:16 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

It wasn't so much I was worried about her "falling behind" those who went out of district. It was more that when I spoke with LS administration, I was told the current K program was "good, okay, sufficient, but not where they wanted it to be". That they do the best they possibly can with a 2 h 45 m day. I wanted my daughter to have more than that. Will it make a difference? I think so, but who knows? I just had to make the decision and feel good about it. It was a tough one- especially financially.

I just don't think that such a tremendous school district like Little Silver should fall in the only 26.7% of NJ school districts that still only have half day Kindergarten. It's where we are lacking and now we have the opportunity to address that.

Dr. Kossack stated our Kindergarteners do not even have the time to play on the Point Road playground because they have to much work to fit in the (less than) half-day program. They are also receiving much less Language Arts and math instruction than those in full day Kindergarten. Go here for more info on this issue: http://www.littlesilverschools.org/lss/

I'd prefer to skip going out to dinner once or twice annually or buying a fancy Christmas gift so that our children can get an even better education. After all, this isn't about parents having more time away from their kids to go to the gym, etc. as some have put out there... It IS about education.
Valerie

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Amy Byrnes

3:49 pm on Sunday, February 19, 2012

Valerie: Thanks for the clarification.

Rick Scott

12:37 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012

In fairness to all who attended the meeting, it should be noted that the vast majority felt that a March vote was unfair to the taxpayers, regardless of how they may feel about the issue. Placing votes that will effect taxes and spending at a time of year that no one even thinks of elections is poor stewardship of the responsibility to represent all the voters. A least 5 asked the school board members present to reconsider the move, given no one in this town even knows what his tax bill will be in July. Several asked why this town meeting about the issue was scheduled for AFTER the filing for the special election in March. No answer.
To say this is about $25 is disingenuous at best. These new rooms will cost
$ 1 million. No small investment in a town of under 6000- with $250,000 from prior taxes and $750,000 to be financed through long term debt. Dr. Kossack herself admitted that we will also need to spend more on technology for all students, and yes, this investment will make finding discretionary funds harder. The the annual operating budget must now support more teachers, pensions and health benefits.
Lastly, no data whatsoever was presented to support the concept that we would get a better educational product for the investment. We were told it was "foundational". When it was pointed out that the NJ ASK testing for third graders showed Little Silver outscoring other area towns- we were told that you can't measure everything in "Statistics".

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Little Silver-Oceanport Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks